Friday, May 8, 2015

Are we ready for a female President?

A few months ago, our Women's History class had a brief conversation about whether or not America  should have  a female president. This controversial subject that caught my eye and my interest in the subject was rekindled in my research about my woman of the week: Belva Lockwood. Besides becoming the first female lawyer, another one of her greatest achievements was that she was the first female to "officially" run for office with n actual campaign. Doing this she managed to gain nearly 5,000 votes, which where all from a male audience since women where not able to vote at the time. If a woman was brave enough to do it in that time period why not  cant the women  of the women of the 21st century stake a strive for the big chair as well?

In my opinion I think a woman is  completely capable of being president; as long as she has the qualities that are needed to lead a nation. I fell very strongly about this, however, there does seem to be some obstacles that even today prevent women from obtaining the position of president. An article I read said that, "American Presidents typically come from just a few high level offices, most of which have had relatively few female occupants."(Ross Cohen). This was an interesting  point because when you think back into the colonization period, many of the presidents were former army generals. Women weren't allowed to fight in the army back then but, even in this day and age where woman actually can join the armed forces, there are very few female generals; even to this day. Another example that the article presents is that even despite the efforts of women like Sarah Palin and Geraldine Ferraro, there has yet to be a female vice president. It also says that even though  many women have been elected as senators and governors, the percentage  of men in these occupations greatly out weigh the percentage of women. Some may deem this as a great accomplishment for women in the political world and others may see it as an aspect the women need to improve on before they consider leading a nation.


Even as I am for  the idea of a female president I feel that others might even take it for granted. They might  not take a female president as seriously as they would a male. They might focus on the more superficial aspects of the female president than they cause they support and their efforts to build a nation. I can just see it now: Hilary Clinton reciting her 2016 inauguration speech and all that's being talked about in the tabloids is the color of the pantsuit she wore that day. There are some women today who would wholeheartedly support a woman going into office, yet, there are also those who are stuck and the past and see men as the better leaders because of the apparent "toughness", "strength", and "aggressiveness" that they have that women supposedly don't. The truth is that women can be as tough and aggressive as they need to be when the time calls for it and at the same time still hold on to their innate nurturing qualities.

Maybe its time for us to break away from the stern and demanding leaders that we have had for centuries and look into a new type of president: one whose nurturing and can empathize with her nation, treating it as if the whole nation its self were her own child. A president who could carry her nation along side her as she helps it grow and prosper into something even better than it was before.  And a president who is welling to recognized all people as equals regardless of their race, background, or ethnicity. We need a president who is able to reform the nation and act as a precedent for other women to do the same.  What do you guys think?

3 comments:

  1. I agree that we need a change in not only our actual elected presidents but in how we want and expect our presidents to be. We always want a strong and tough leader which I will say is the reason we haven't had a female president because we don't see women as being strong and tough. I think a women in office would be a nice thing because women are naturally nurturing and reasonable. which some can use that as a argument that she isn't tough enough to be in a "manly" position. i also think that people shouldn't vote for a women running just because she is a women but the she is QUALIFIED for the job because that can make a huge difference too. If you vote for a women just for that reason and she is a terrible president then it would make it harder for other females who want to run because of the fact that it didn't work out the first time. I think we are ready for a women president but she has to be qualified and ready to be put in that spotlight because it will be harder on her as it always is on women

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you, I think that we should break away from stern and the traditional serious presidents and we have started with Obama. President Obama is not the typical president, he goes on tv for other reasons besides official addresses. He has been on countless talk shows and is not afraid to make a joke. even at his own expense. President Obama is the first president I feel like I actually know. I think Hillary Clinton would continue this normalcy and like you said she is nurturing and caring and she would be able to see things from a woman's point of view which no president has been able to before. Also Hillary is highly qualified and I think that it's time that we have a woman president.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed reading your blog, Neith. However, I do not feel like our country is ready for a female President. Likewise, we should not make the choice to have one based on the fact that we have not had one before. There is still gender discrimination in our society. We cannot expect that to change because our President is a female. It's just like how people say racism is ending because the President is African American. Based on recent events, such as the government shut down, we know that is far from the truth. If a woman, as President, makes a mistake, I feel like she will receive worse backlash than a man would. Women, since the beginning of time, are always thought to make the wrong choice when given decision-making power.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.